<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2372909272317933706</id><updated>2011-04-21T12:43:15.716-07:00</updated><category term='Nuclear Waste'/><category term='Cost of Nuclear'/><title type='text'>Communities  Against Nuclear Expansion (CANE)</title><subtitle type='html'>Many of us thought that some highly critical reports about the future of nuclear power kicked any thought of new nuclear builds into the long grass. CANE is  astonished that this is not the case. 

In spite of the increase in the cost of gas and oil, the case just does not stack up. I will therefore, along with other concerned individuals, do all in my power that is legal and honest to oppose any building of new nukes in our area and in the UK.</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://suffolkcane.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2372909272317933706/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://suffolkcane.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><author><name>Pete Rowberry</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15530437336803122980</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://bp1.blogger.com/_qR93Naoe0_U/SG93oraGhUI/AAAAAAAAACM/jbqk6DapeJ8/S220/Pete+Portrait+for+web.png'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>4</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2372909272317933706.post-1311434050805938731</id><published>2008-12-11T02:25:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2008-12-11T02:35:30.759-08:00</updated><title type='text'>A Crtical Phase</title><content type='html'>We are now entering a critical phase in the move to develop new nuclear power stations in the UK. British Energy is about to be purchased by the French nationalised company, EdF subject to regulatory and shareholder approval by the early part of next year. BE is consulting locally about the Environmental Impact of thewir new build program. The consultation on the proposed sites for new nuclear power stations is over and we are expecting the results to be published soon. We hope that the government is better at incorporating the comments that they were with the Energy White Paper.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The National Policy Statement on Nuclear Power is about to be drafted. This is in spite of the evidence that nuclear power is not cheap, safe or non-polluting! The latest evidence shows that nuclear energy costs around 14 cents per megawatt, compared with 7 cents for wind. WE NEED YOUR HELP. Write to your MP and let us know your opinion.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please see the CANE web site (&lt;a href="http://www.suffolkcane.org.uk/"&gt;www.suffolkcane.org.uk&lt;/a&gt;) for more details.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2372909272317933706-1311434050805938731?l=suffolkcane.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://suffolkcane.blogspot.com/feeds/1311434050805938731/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2372909272317933706&amp;postID=1311434050805938731' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2372909272317933706/posts/default/1311434050805938731'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2372909272317933706/posts/default/1311434050805938731'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://suffolkcane.blogspot.com/2008/12/crtical-phase.html' title='A Crtical Phase'/><author><name>Pete Rowberry</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15530437336803122980</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://bp1.blogger.com/_qR93Naoe0_U/SG93oraGhUI/AAAAAAAAACM/jbqk6DapeJ8/S220/Pete+Portrait+for+web.png'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2372909272317933706.post-7010677753384236586</id><published>2008-07-09T13:27:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-07-09T13:29:45.969-07:00</updated><title type='text'>CANE "Green Paper"</title><content type='html'>CANE are considering producing a "Green Paper" to counter some of the more obvious pro-nuclear information circulated by the nuclear industry. We'd appreciate any ideas or any of the most important issues you wish us to address.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2372909272317933706-7010677753384236586?l=suffolkcane.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://suffolkcane.blogspot.com/feeds/7010677753384236586/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2372909272317933706&amp;postID=7010677753384236586' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2372909272317933706/posts/default/7010677753384236586'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2372909272317933706/posts/default/7010677753384236586'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://suffolkcane.blogspot.com/2008/07/cane-green-paper.html' title='CANE &quot;Green Paper&quot;'/><author><name>Pete Rowberry</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15530437336803122980</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://bp1.blogger.com/_qR93Naoe0_U/SG93oraGhUI/AAAAAAAAACM/jbqk6DapeJ8/S220/Pete+Portrait+for+web.png'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2372909272317933706.post-4007672277978652762</id><published>2008-07-05T06:38:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2008-07-05T06:40:23.214-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Nuclear Waste'/><title type='text'>Nuclear Waste Storage</title><content type='html'>In 1997, the Environment Agency refused permission for a deep level nuclear waste store. The Government says that such a store is an essential part of its strategy. What has changed? Any nuclear scientists out there that know the answer?&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2372909272317933706-4007672277978652762?l=suffolkcane.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://suffolkcane.blogspot.com/feeds/4007672277978652762/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2372909272317933706&amp;postID=4007672277978652762' title='1 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2372909272317933706/posts/default/4007672277978652762'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2372909272317933706/posts/default/4007672277978652762'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://suffolkcane.blogspot.com/2008/07/nuclear-waste-storage.html' title='Nuclear Waste Storage'/><author><name>Pete Rowberry</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15530437336803122980</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://bp1.blogger.com/_qR93Naoe0_U/SG93oraGhUI/AAAAAAAAACM/jbqk6DapeJ8/S220/Pete+Portrait+for+web.png'/></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2372909272317933706.post-5371003229019946239</id><published>2008-07-05T06:22:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2008-07-05T06:37:00.102-07:00</updated><category scheme='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#' term='Cost of Nuclear'/><title type='text'>The Real Cost of Nuclear</title><content type='html'>The CANE web site (&lt;a href="http://www.suffolkcane.org.uk/"&gt;http://www.suffolkcane.org.uk/&lt;/a&gt;) puts forward some arguments about the real cost of nuclear power. Are our facts correct and what are the costs of alternatives?&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2372909272317933706-5371003229019946239?l=suffolkcane.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://suffolkcane.blogspot.com/feeds/5371003229019946239/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2372909272317933706&amp;postID=5371003229019946239' title='13 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2372909272317933706/posts/default/5371003229019946239'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2372909272317933706/posts/default/5371003229019946239'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://suffolkcane.blogspot.com/2008/07/real-cost-of-nuclear.html' title='The Real Cost of Nuclear'/><author><name>Pete Rowberry</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/15530437336803122980</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='http://bp1.blogger.com/_qR93Naoe0_U/SG93oraGhUI/AAAAAAAAACM/jbqk6DapeJ8/S220/Pete+Portrait+for+web.png'/></author><thr:total>13</thr:total></entry></feed>
